[License-review] avoid gray areas?
nelson at crynwr.com
Sat Mar 3 04:47:22 UTC 2012
Josh Berkus writes:
> > I don't think these two statements are really very closely linked.
> > 1. "Bruce [is] telling people to avoid gray areas."
> > 2. "[A very black-and-white issue applies to CC0.]"
> > (I obviously just paraphrased the second case.)
> > You're talking about different things.
> Russ was arguing for acceptance of CC0 based on the "grey area" argument
> above. So at least in his mind it's equivalent.
No, I'm arguing that if we should decline the CC0 because code
licensed under it doesn't come with a patent license, then we should
deprecate the BSD (&etc) because it doesn't come with a patent
license. DiBona agreed with this statement.
Or, if they do come with an implicit patent license, it's too much of
a grey area for us to be making guarantees to people.
I'm not sure that "our public" is ready to have the BSD license be
deprecated. I could be wrong, of course.
--my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports open source software
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog
More information about the License-review