[License-review] Section 203(a) copyright recapture
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Sat Feb 18 05:18:24 UTC 2012
Bruce Perens scripsit:
> This is moot to the issue of the CC0 license.
Quite so. I merely brought it up as an example of "what can't be
cured must be endured." I think the risk of being sued for patent
infringement by the copyright owner is trivial compared to the risk of
being sued by a third-party patent troll, and therefore that explicit
patent disclaimers do not materially increase the risk.
I note that MIT has said that the MIT license is not an implicit patent
> Section (1) requires a large enough majority in a joint work that most
> community-developed products could never be recaptured, as far as I
> can tell.
There are many works developed by a single author, or where
contributions by others are small enough to be de minimis.
John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Charles li reis, nostre emperesdre magnes,
Set anz totz pleinz ad ested in Espagnes.
More information about the License-review