[License-review] Submitting CC0 for OSI approval
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Sat Feb 18 04:53:51 UTC 2012
Russ Nelson scripsit:
>> For example, they don't say that authors have to ship the source
>> code EVER!
Quite so. Nothing stops you from distributing a pile of bits and
attaching the BSD license to it; for example, you could ship a bitmap
image with the BSD license, allowing people to modify and redistribute
it using bitmap editors.
Bruce Perens scripsit:
> This is because the OSD is not for the certification of software as
> Open Source, but for the certification of the set of licenses attached
> to that software as Open Source licenses.
Well, with the exception of OSD #2, which *is* a constraint on software.
For software to be open source, it must be licensed under an open-source
license that satisfies #1 and #3-#10, and the software must be provided
in conformity with #2. Those are independent criteria.
In the case of the bitmap (assuming you didn't develop the image *as*
a bitmap in the first place, in which case the bitmap is the source),
the license is open source but the bitmap is not, because of #2.
No saves, Antonio, loke es morirse en su lingua. Es komo John Cowan
kedarse soliko en el silensyo kada dya ke Dyo da, komo cowan at ccil.org
ser sikileoso sin saver porke. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
--Marcel Cohen, 1985
More information about the License-review