[License-discuss] [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]
nelson at crynwr.com
Sat Mar 10 04:40:32 UTC 2012
John Cowan writes:
> Jim Jagielski scripsit:
> > I see no difference between the statements "We can't approve this
> > because it doesn't address patents" and "We can't approve this
> > because it doesn't address the US export laws."
> Patently, because a patent owner can opt out of enforcing his patents,
> but not out of obeying U.S. law, which either applies or it doesn't.
You and Jim are talking about different things. Knowing that, the
difference should be plain. Ask me if it isn't.
--my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports open source software
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog
More information about the License-discuss