[License-discuss] [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]
jim at jimjag.com
Fri Mar 9 17:28:40 UTC 2012
On Mar 9, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Jim Jagielski (jim at jimjag.com):
>> BTW: How is this different from, say, the US export control provisions?
>> In both cases, a codebase is encumbered by external, and "localized"
>> restrictions. So does this mean that software distributed out of
>> the US, no matter the OSI license, isn't "really" open source?
> During the period that the RSA algorithm was encumbered by a (somewhat
> weak and potentially challengable) patent in USA jurisdictions, mod_ssl
> was widely considered to effectively not be open source when deployed in
> the USA, yes.
But that's not the point... the point is that if we are looking
at adjusting the OSD, or acceptance/validation of a license, based
on whether or not it addresses patents, then why aren't we also
worried about such issues as the export control, etc...
I see no difference between the statements "We can't approve this
because it doesn't address patents" and "We can't approve this
because it doesn't address the US export laws."
More information about the License-discuss