[License-discuss] [License-review] CC withdrawl of CC0 from OSI process
perrin at apotheon.com
Mon Feb 27 08:12:36 UTC 2012
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:08:17AM -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Chad Perrin:
> > Explain to me how wanting to enforce a crapton of additional terms is
> > "realism" instead of "a more-restrictive license".
> Mu. This request has nothing to do with what I said, and I just don't
> have that time to waste.
If that has nothing to do with what you said, what you said must have
nothing to do with the points to which you replied.
> Anyway, I already pointed out extremely basic problems with 'Unlicense'
> on licence-review.
. . . which you say as though I were somehow disagreeing here. That
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
More information about the License-discuss