[License-discuss] Looking for a license agreement.
forums at david-woolley.me.uk
Thu Oct 6 21:06:58 UTC 2011
Rudy Lippan wrote:
> There may not be intellectual property in the components; however, there is work
> involved in their creation. As such, I think it would be fair to be able to
> attribute the creator some level of control over the use use of the product.
> License may be the wrong term here, but the idea is the same.
That's why the UK recognizes database copyrights. However, if no such
statute applies, you must create a contract with every transfer or copy
of the components, and as part of that contract, require the receiving
party to treat them as confidential. I'm not sure that is compatible
with open source.
Creating a contract where no money changes hands can be difficult.
You are creating the opposite of a licence; you are imposing
restrictions where none previously existed.
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
More information about the License-discuss